To see how price controls affect market outcomes, let’s look
once again at the market for ice cream. As we saw in if ice cream is sold in a
competitive market free of government regulation the price of ice cream adjusts
to balance supply and demand. At the equilibrium price the quantity of ice
cream that buyers want to buy exactly equals the quantity that sellers want to
sell. To be concrete, suppose the equilibrium price is $3 per cone.
Not everyone may be happy with the outcome of this free-market
process. Let’s say the American Association of Ice-Cream Eaters complains that
the $3 price is too high for everyone to enjoy a cone a day (thir recommended
diet). Meanwhile the National Organization of Ice Cream Makers complains that
the $3 price the result of cutthroat competition is too low and is depressing
the incomes of its members. Each of these groups lobbies the government to pass
laws that alter the market outcome by directly controlling the price of an
ice-cream cone.
Of course because buyers of any good always want a lower
price while sellers want a higher price the interests of the two groups
conflict. If the Ice-Cream Eaters are successful in their lobbying the
government imposes a legal maximum on the price at which ice cream can be sold.
Because the price is not allowed to rise above this level the legislated
maximum is called a price ceiling. By contrast if the ice cream makers are
successful the government imposes a legal minimum on the price. Because the
price cannot fall below this level the legislated minimum is called a price
floor. Let us consider the effects of these policies in turn.
Comments
Post a Comment