Suppose that Peter and Paula both take the same amount of
water from the town well. To pay for maintaining the well, the town taxes its
residents. Peter has income of $50,000 and is taxed $5,000 or 10 percent of his
income. Paula has income of $10,000 and is taxed $2,000, or 20 percent of her
income.
Is this policy fair? If not, who pays too much and who pays
too little? Does it matter whether Paula,s low income is due to a medical
disability or to her decision to pursue a career in acting? Does it matter
whether Peter’s high income is due to a large inheritance or to his willingness
to work long hours at a dreary job?
These are difficult questions on which people are likely to
disagree. If the town hired two experts to study how the town should tax its
residents to pay for the well, we would not be surprised if they offered conflicting advice.
This simple example shows why economists sometimes disagree
about public policy. As we learned earlier in our discussion of normative and
positive analysis, policies cannot be judged on scientific grounds alone.
Economists give conflicting advice sometimes because they have different
values. Perfecting the science economics will not tell us whether Peter or
Paula pays too much.
Comments
Post a Comment