This chapter introduced the basic
tools of welfare economics consumer and producer surplus and used them to
evaluate the efficiency of free markets. We showed that the forces of supply
and demand allocate resources efficiency. That is even though each buyer and
seller in a market is concerned only about his or her own welfare they are
together led by an invisible hand to an equilibrium that maximizes the total
benefits to buyers and sellers.
A word of warning is in order. To
conclude that markets are efficient we made several assumptions about how
markets work. When these assumptions do not hold our conclusion that the market
equilibrium is efficient may no longer be true. As we close this chapter let,s
consider briefly two of the most important of these assumptions.
First our analysis assumed that
markets are perfectly competitive. In the world however competition is
sometimes far perfect. In some markets a single buyer or seller (or a small
group of them) may be able to control market prices. This ability to influence
prices is called market power. Market power can cause markets to be inefficient
because it keeps the price and quantity away from the equilibrium of supply and
demand.
Second our analysis assumed that
the outcome in a market matters only to the buyers and sellers in the market.
Yet in the world the decisions of buyers and sellers sometimes affect people
who are not participants in the market at all. Pollution is the classic example
of a market outcome that affects people not in the market. Such side effects
called externalities cause welfare in a market to depend on more than just the
value to the buyers and the cost to the
sellers. Because buyers and sellers do not take these side effects into account
when deciding how much to consume and produce the equilibrium in a market can
be inefficient from the standpoint of society as a whole.
Comments
Post a Comment