Our goal in developing the concept of consumer surplus is to
make judgments about the desirability of market outcomes. Now that you have
seen what consumer surplus is let’s consider whether it is good measure of
economic well-being.
Imagine that you are a policymaker trying to design a good
economic system. Would you are about the amount of consumer surplus? Consumer
surplus the amount that buyers are willing to pay for a good minus the amount
they actually pay for it measures the benefit that buyers receive from a good
as the buyers themselves perceive it. Thus consumer surplus is a good measure
of economic well-being if policymakers want to respect the preferences of
buyers.
In some circumstances policymakers might choose not to care
about consumer surplus because they do not respect the preferences that drive
buyer behavior. For example drug addicts are willing to pay high price for
heroin. Yet we would not say that addicts get a large benefit from being able
to buy heroin at a low price (even though addicts might say they do). From the
satnd-point of society willingness to pay in this instance is not a good measure
of the buyer benefit and consumer surplus is not a good measure of economic
well-being because addicts are not looking after their own interests.
In most markets however consumer surplus does reflect
economic well-being. Economic normally assume that buyers are rational when
they make decisions. Rational people do the best they can a achieve their
objectives given their opportunities. Economist also normally assume that
people’s preferences should be
respected. In this case consumer are the best judges of how much benefit they
receive from the goods they buy.

Comments
Post a Comment