A common argument is that free trade is desirable only if
all countries play by the same rules. If firms in different countries are
subject to different laws and regulations then it is unfair ( the argument goes to)expect the firms to
compete in the international marketplace. For instance suppose that the
government of Neighborland subsidizes its steel industry by giving steel
companies large tax breaks. The Isolandian steel industry might angue that it
should be protected from this foreign competition because Neighborland is not
competing fairly.
Would it in fact, hurt Isoland to buy steel from another
country at a subsidized. Certainly, Isolandian steel producers would suffer but
Isolandian steel consumers would benefit from the low price. The case for free
trade is no different: The gains of the consumers from buying at the low price
would exceed the losses of the producers. Neighborland’s subside to its steel
industry may be a bad policy but it is the taxpayers of Neighborland who bear
the burden. Isoland can benefit from the opportunity to buy steel at a
subsidized price.
Comments
Post a Comment