Instead of regulating behavior in response to an
externality the government can use market-based policies to align private
incentives with social efficiency. For instance as we saw earlier the
government can internalize the externality by taxing activities that have
negative externalities and subsidizing activities that have positive
externalities. Taxes enacted to deal with the effects of negative externalities
are called corrective taxes. They are also called pigovian taxes after
economists Arthur Pigou (1877-1959) an early advocate of their use. An ideal corrective
tax would equal the external cost from an activity with negative externalities
and an ideal corrective subsidy would equal the external benefit from and
activity with positive externalities.
Economists usually because they prefer corrective taxes
to regulations as a way to deal with pollution because they can reduce
pollution at a lower cost to society.
The regulations would dictate a level of pollution
whereas the tax would give factory owners an economic incentive to reduce
pollution.
Most economists would prefer the tax. They would first
point out that a tax is just as effective a regulation in reducing the overall
level of pollution. The EPA can achieve whatever level of pollution it wants by
setting the tax at the appropriate level. The higher the tax the larger the
reduction in pollution. Indeed if the tax is high enough the factories will
close down altogether reducing pollution to zero.
Comments
Post a Comment