To gain some intuition for why
taxes result in deadweight losses consider an example. Imagine that joe cleans
Jane’s house each week. The opportunity cost of Joe’s time is and the value of
a clean house to Jane. Thus Joe and Jane
each receive a benefit from their deal. The total surplus of measures the gains
from trade in this particular transaction.
Now suppose that the government
levies a tax on the providers of cleaning services. There is now price that
Jane can pay Joe that will leave both of them better off after paying the tax. The most Jane would be
willing to pay is but then Joe would be left with only after paying the tax
which is less than his opportunity cost. Conversely hor Joe to receive his
opportunity cost of Jane would need to which is above the value she places on a
clean house. As a result Jane and Joe cancel their arrangement. Joe goes
without the income and Jane lives in a dirtier house.
The tax has made Joe and Jane
worse off by a total of because they have each lost of surplus. But note that
the government collects no revenue from Joe and Jane because they decide to
cancel their arrangement. The is pure deadweight loss. It is a loss to buyers
and sellers in a market that is not offset by and increase in government
revenue. From this example we can see the ultimate source of deadweight losses:
taxes cause deadweight losses because they percent buyers and sellers from
realizing some of the gains from trade.
Comments
Post a Comment