One day in 1974 economists Arthur Laffer sat in a Washington
restaurant with some prominent journalists and politicians. He took out a
napkin and drew a figure on it to show how tax rates affect tax revenue. It
looked much like. Laffer then suggested the United Staes was on the
downward-sloping side of this curve. Tax rates were so high he argued that
reducing them would actually raise tax revenue.
Most economists were skeptical of Laffer’s suggestion. The idea that a cut in tax rates
could raise tax revenue was correct as a matter of economic theory but there
was more doubt about whether it would do so in practice. There was little
evidence for Laffer’s view that U. S. tax rates had in fact reached such extreme levels.
Nonetheless the laffer curve (as it became known) captured
the imagination of Ronald Reagan. David Stockman budget director in the first
Reagan administration offers the following
story.
When Reagan ran for president in 1980 he made cutting taxes
part of his platform. Reagan argued that taxes were so high that they were
discouraging hard work. He argued that lower taxes would give people the proper
incentive to work which would raise economic
well-being and perhaps even tax revenue. Because the cut in tax rates
was intended to encourage people to increase the quantity of labor they
supplied the views of Laffer and Reagan
become known as supply-side economics.
Economists continue to debate Laffer’s argument. Many
believe that subsequent history refuted Laffer’s conjecture that lower tax rates would raise tax revenue. Yet
because history is open to alternative interpretations other economists view
the events of the 1980s as more favorable to the supply siders.
Comments
Post a Comment