A country
can take one of two approaches free trade. It can take a unilateral approach
and remove its trade restrictions on its own. This is the approach that Great
Britain took in the 19th century and that Chili and South Korea Have
taken in recent years. Alternatively a country can take a multilateral approach
and reduce its trade restrictions while other countries do the same. In other
words it can bargain with its trading partners in an attempt to reduce trade
restrictions around the world.
One
advantage is that the multilateral approach has the potential to result in
freer trade than a unilateral approach because it can reduce trade restrictions
abroad as well as at home. If international negotiations fail however the
result could be more restricted trade than under a unilateral approach.
In addition
the multilateral approach may have a political advantage. In most markets,
producers are fewer and better organized than consumers and thus wield greater
political influence. Reducing the Isolandian tariff on steel, for example may
be politically difficult if considered by itself. The steel companies would
oppose free trade and the users of steel who would benefit are so numerous that
organizing their support would be difficult. Yet suppose that Neighborland
promises to reduce its tariff on wheat at the same time that Isoland reduce its
tariff on steel. In this case the
Isolandian wheat farmers who are also politically powerful would back the agreement
wheat farmers, who are also politically powerful would back the agreement. Thus
the multilateral approach to free trade can sometimes win political support
when a unilateral reduction cannot.
Comments
Post a Comment